I think you have in mind a robot in the real world. I do believe that the real AI would have to be embodied, have body which can use to sense and understand the things by itself (example: you can teach an AI to recognize a chair but you can not teach that it can use a rock as a chair unless it goes and sits there).

Emotions are one of the things you might need to create a similar human intelligence, but there are also more things you would need (abstract representation, abstract reasoning, imagination, self representation, etc). Take a look to this research about machine conciousness: http://www.conscious-robots.com/consscale/

Unfortunately the research are more focused in the AI that leads to better algorithms as better image recognition. All the part about a real robot intelligence which can feel is mostly missing and few people work on this.

The robots are extremely expensive to build, scale and adopt just for the sake of training. With VR it will be much more plausible.

Plus not only me would get to develop the "core". I want to provide the ground for this direction.

And yeap, the actual "mission" behind this idea is actually closer to "a real robot intelligence which can feel" and reason.

Are you suggesting that we improve AI by directly tapping into the human brain's 3D representations? (Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "interface".)

We're still at the beginning of learning how the brain works. Can you lay out a plausible roadmap for how your product will be realized within the 10 years? 20 years?

In short, yes, it does sound crazy.

In short, yes.

By interface I mean a "cage" of neurons connected to the inputs/outputs (similarly to humans) that can host different deep neural networks (and be used as a training environment).

The basic interface can be realised within weeks - that would include stereo-imaging input and basic motor tasks. But the more complex it gets - the more work is needed of course (not mentioning development of the hosted AI models).

When would real be real enough? Didn't DARPA already do this for some of their AI work?

DARPA AI simulator:

http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/robotics-softwar...

http://gazebosim.org/

Real is real - when you make it real ,) I think that DARPA's research (robotics) is lacking the scale (which VR and mass adoption can bring).

Anything like OpenAI's Gym: https://gym.openai.com

One might think about it as adding additional degrees of freedom.

The goal is similar but unlike OpenAI's Gym or DeepMind I want to construct a training ground much more close to the reality in VR that would also allow interactions with humans (e.g. to be trained as well).

It's a logical step after image recognition and playing simple games.

What are the status and roadmap in regard to implementation?

Speaking honestly, the idea is at the level of early experiments. I can get the basic stereo-imaging and motor inputs/outputs within a month. Next would be work on getting feedback system from the environment/surrounding objects including the spectator interactions. This would take another month or a bit more. Finally another month (and more) would consist of experiments on embedding neural nets and scaling the training process. If to move quickly 3 months is enough to build a basis.