Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I had not cared that much about this, but his actions are exactly what I would have expected from bitcoin's creator. There are some guys who simply do not want to be found. The guy who created Bitcoin is one of them. Making things develop like this simultaneously repairs much of the damage to his anonymity while minimizing the damage to the two guys who put their reputations on the line for him. By acting the way that you are acting, you are acting exactly like he intended for you to act. There is simply insufficient public evidence to say whether he is or is not. He is in that pesky excluded middle that gives rise to pseudo-Boolean logic.

That being said, people should realize that the creator of Bitcoin does not want to be found and honor that.



So you expected the real Satoshi to keep his anonymity by announcing his identity to the world and then backing up the announcement with "proof" that is clearly false?


This. And the way he did it. Why would he run to GQ and BBC instead of simply posting online, as with previous communication.


Wat?

People who "simply do not want to be found" don't make any sorts of claims whatsoever. People who make fraudulent claims are scammers, plain and simple.

The fraudulent evidence that Wright has presented doesn't make it more likely that he's Satoshi, they make it much, much less likely. At this point, it's more reasonable to assume Donald Trump invented BitCoin than Wright.


This is perfectly parodied by: https://twitter.com/RealCraigWright/status/72752133741419315...

(PS I tried to upvote you out of invisibility because while I think you are wrong the replies are valuable)


I think this is actually terrific:

https://twitter.com/RealCraigWright/status/72824283201683865...

I must find out who the real Real Craig Wright is at once. This is hilarious.


How funny would it be if it were real Satoshi trolling fake Satoshi


If Wright was indeed Satoshi, but now wanted people to think he is not Satoshi, he would simply say "I lied, I'm not Satoshi."


If you read the first comment there's a lot of stuff you would not expect of the real Satoshi:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11609611


If we want to follow the conspiracy theory path, then this is sort of a last resort trick that may work when you're building up suspicion and need a way out, instead he started the whole charade without actually being ever closed to be linked to Satoshi


This is how religions start. Congrats, you are the first of the "believers".


You are being downvoted because your statements simultaneously conflict and support themselves.

As for honor, if the creator of Bitcoin exists as a single entity then it's about time for them to stand up and take some responsibility in the disaster that is the Bitcoin community. Creating something so important and then leaving town is immature, illogical and down right annoying.

While I'm at it, fuck you Satoshi.


> As for honor, if the creator of Bitcoin exists as a single entity then it's about time for them to stand up and take some responsibility in the disaster that is the Bitcoin community. Creating something so important and then leaving town is immature, illogical and down right annoying.

Satoshi is not responsible for the Bitcoin community any more than he is responsible for the quality of this Hacker News comment you've just written. I understand the annoyance of not knowing who Satoshi is, but he/she/they doesn't owe us anything.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: