I already laid out the case for affirmative action which has nothing to do with any inherent racial ability whatsoever. Your reply:
> What if the "privilege" you think you see is actually a difference in average ability or preferences between groups of people that are in fact different from each other?
...is the textbook definition of racism (and sexism). Moreover it criticizes affirmative action precisely on the basis that there are inherent differences of ability among different groups, by race or gender, etc.
Initially I gave you the benefit of the doubt, assuming for the sake of argument and also in the interest of fair discussion that you probably didn't mean what you said, exactly. It is clear now I overestimated you.
> What if the "privilege" you think you see is actually a difference in average ability or preferences between groups of people that are in fact different from each other?
...is the textbook definition of racism (and sexism). Moreover it criticizes affirmative action precisely on the basis that there are inherent differences of ability among different groups, by race or gender, etc.
Initially I gave you the benefit of the doubt, assuming for the sake of argument and also in the interest of fair discussion that you probably didn't mean what you said, exactly. It is clear now I overestimated you.