1) I don't know if that's a wise decision. To me, BS serves as a "base", my custom classes extend and borrow from BS and everything is knitted together.
2) BS 4 added a ton of helper classes, to the point where I find myself using these rather than writing custom CSS.
3) Ultra light font weight, light gray font color, capitalized text might look great, but I prefer better usability. The point with BS (as of my observations that is) has always been to provide a no-bullshit™ style. It doesn't follow trends, it does what's sane.
4) I half-agree. Not sure how useful it is to have "notifications". I personally never needed that and doubt their usability on mostly document oriented websites.
5) BS used to come with icons, but now there are tons of icon sets to choose from. BS is a CSS framework after all.
6) Besides that, what components does UIKit have that BS can't do? Maybe sticky behavior with a delay would be helpful.
BS is 125 KB vs UIKit 256 KB minified though (that's only for CSS), besides all the accessibility issues.
2) BS 4 added a ton of helper classes, to the point where I find myself using these rather than writing custom CSS.
3) Ultra light font weight, light gray font color, capitalized text might look great, but I prefer better usability. The point with BS (as of my observations that is) has always been to provide a no-bullshit™ style. It doesn't follow trends, it does what's sane.
4) I half-agree. Not sure how useful it is to have "notifications". I personally never needed that and doubt their usability on mostly document oriented websites.
5) BS used to come with icons, but now there are tons of icon sets to choose from. BS is a CSS framework after all.
6) Besides that, what components does UIKit have that BS can't do? Maybe sticky behavior with a delay would be helpful.
BS is 125 KB vs UIKit 256 KB minified though (that's only for CSS), besides all the accessibility issues.