I'm always amazed at the naive optimism of people when I see them open restaurants in "hot" markets. I see this in NYC where the first year failure rate for new restaurants is something like 80%.
Gordon Ramsay has a lot to say about running a restaurant as a business. I'm kinda amazed that there are people (this being a general comment, not directed at the OP) who would actually learn something just by watching a few episodes of:
- BBC's The Restaurant Man [1]
- Kitchen Nightmares (US or UK)
Gordon Ramsay has a pretty simple formula for a restaurant. When you divide up your revenue you need to be looking at:
- One third for food
- One third for labour
- One third for gross profits
If your plan doesn't look like that, throw it away and start again.
A few things stuck out to me, not just about the post but from several other comments here:
1. This is commercial rent. As opposed to residential rent, a commercial lessor provides the property as-is where-is. The lessee is responsible for maintenance and any improvements they want or need to do. If you didn't factor in the cost of improvements then that's really on you.
2. As someone else mentioned, you can sell $60 chicken but it needs to belong in an area that can support it (eg in NYC terms, open such a restaurant in the Upper East Side not Flatbush). Likewise the decor and the service need to be to a standard that someone ordering $60 chicken demands.
3. Gordon Ramsay really harps on the point about controlling food costs and gives some pretty good examples of dishes that might have 2-3 pounds in ingredients that people would pay 10 pounds for where the restauranteurs want the "best ingredients" that might cost 15 pounds... for an appetizer. Now I don't mean this in the sense that you use cheap/bad ingredients, just that not everything has to be white truffles.
4. Marketing is super-important. The UK Kitchen Nightmares has some pretty good examples of this. Holding a sign up in a tourist area saying "5 Euro Vegetarian 2 course lunch" generating hundreds of covers. Handing out free samples at a commuter train station as people come home from work. I think a lot of people play the "review game" and rely on an audience magically happening. It's bizarre.
5. Finding a good chef is hard. When you do, you want to keep them, even build the restaurant around them. This isn't just about cooking good food. It's about consistency, building the kitchen staff and managing a kitchen. You probably want to give such a person, if you find them, a share of the business. As in you want a cofounder not an employee.
6. Boring is good. Another commenter mentioned this. Hot markets are high risk but high reward. People get captivated by the high reward part. Years ago, I came across a cafe in a suburban main street. No amazing location or anything like that. Just a nice atmosphere, good food and a captive local market where the residents liked to go there regularly. Friends of family owned it and I was surprised to learn that place had a gross profit of $13,000/week.
Anyway, this is the interesting part about working in tech. You see how much money you can make either by working for one of the tech giants or even working for yourself and it's nowhere near as stressful as running a restaurant but the rewards are so much higher that it makes doing anything else or running almost any other sort of business a complete financial nonstarter and basically a lifestyle choice yet these can be really good options for many of those outside tech.
Gordon Ramsay has so much experience and good advice in controlling costs. As he says, you can make the best food in the world but if your restaurant can't turn a profit how stupid are you going to look?
Back in his starting out days he was so concerned with portion control and food costs he wouldn't even let the pasta dough that gets stuck to your fingers go to waste. Just every little detail. He couldn't afford truffles so he'd buy the broken pieces from the truffle dealer at a huge discount.
He talks about when he worked with Marco Pierre White at Harvey's that MPW had to have the best of everything and the food was amazing. But that place never really made any money despite being sold out every night.
He breaks the restaurant business into 4 weeks per month: Week 1 you make enough to pay your staff for the month. Week 2 you make enough to pay your food costs for the month. Week 3 you make enough to fund the operation (rent, bills, etc) for the month. Week 4 should be your profit.
When. I was an apprentice Gordon Ramsay was the man I looked too, his TV series (sans kitchen nightmare), was so informative, especially his UK series. It reinforced so much that I hadn't really paid attention to in college, and I don't think I would have ever gotten anywhere near as high as I did without his knowledge.
This is commercial rent. As opposed to residential rent, a commercial lessor provides the property as-is where-is. The lessee is responsible for maintenance and any improvements they want or need to do. If you didn't factor in the cost of improvements then that's really on you.
Serious question, what are the responsibilities and risks of the landlord?
This should be top comment not mine, he didn't control anything by the sounds of it, and insisted on top quality items when the customer base didn't support it.
Now take out taxes and your left with roughly $100K/year to pay yourself and any partners... Not exactly living high on the hog. And the hours for that pay can easily top 80/week.
Why the downvotes? This is basic accounting, not judging. Having a gross of $13K/week is a tough tough nut especially if you have any debt to service (SBA loans etc), or an equity partner expecting more than a free meal once in a while.
Ah... I also mentally transposed that to monthly net. I've never heard of someone referring to that as "gross profit"; my accountant would have lectured me for hours if I made a reference like that.
Gordon Ramsay has a lot to say about running a restaurant as a business. I'm kinda amazed that there are people (this being a general comment, not directed at the OP) who would actually learn something just by watching a few episodes of:
- BBC's The Restaurant Man [1]
- Kitchen Nightmares (US or UK)
Gordon Ramsay has a pretty simple formula for a restaurant. When you divide up your revenue you need to be looking at:
- One third for food
- One third for labour
- One third for gross profits
If your plan doesn't look like that, throw it away and start again.
A few things stuck out to me, not just about the post but from several other comments here:
1. This is commercial rent. As opposed to residential rent, a commercial lessor provides the property as-is where-is. The lessee is responsible for maintenance and any improvements they want or need to do. If you didn't factor in the cost of improvements then that's really on you.
2. As someone else mentioned, you can sell $60 chicken but it needs to belong in an area that can support it (eg in NYC terms, open such a restaurant in the Upper East Side not Flatbush). Likewise the decor and the service need to be to a standard that someone ordering $60 chicken demands.
3. Gordon Ramsay really harps on the point about controlling food costs and gives some pretty good examples of dishes that might have 2-3 pounds in ingredients that people would pay 10 pounds for where the restauranteurs want the "best ingredients" that might cost 15 pounds... for an appetizer. Now I don't mean this in the sense that you use cheap/bad ingredients, just that not everything has to be white truffles.
4. Marketing is super-important. The UK Kitchen Nightmares has some pretty good examples of this. Holding a sign up in a tourist area saying "5 Euro Vegetarian 2 course lunch" generating hundreds of covers. Handing out free samples at a commuter train station as people come home from work. I think a lot of people play the "review game" and rely on an audience magically happening. It's bizarre.
5. Finding a good chef is hard. When you do, you want to keep them, even build the restaurant around them. This isn't just about cooking good food. It's about consistency, building the kitchen staff and managing a kitchen. You probably want to give such a person, if you find them, a share of the business. As in you want a cofounder not an employee.
6. Boring is good. Another commenter mentioned this. Hot markets are high risk but high reward. People get captivated by the high reward part. Years ago, I came across a cafe in a suburban main street. No amazing location or anything like that. Just a nice atmosphere, good food and a captive local market where the residents liked to go there regularly. Friends of family owned it and I was surprised to learn that place had a gross profit of $13,000/week.
Anyway, this is the interesting part about working in tech. You see how much money you can make either by working for one of the tech giants or even working for yourself and it's nowhere near as stressful as running a restaurant but the rewards are so much higher that it makes doing anything else or running almost any other sort of business a complete financial nonstarter and basically a lifestyle choice yet these can be really good options for many of those outside tech.
[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03t7vm5