Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, it depends on your point of view.

Microsoft, and Linux (just the kernel I'm talking about here), have both decided the point of an OS is to run programs, so with each update they both heroic efforts to not break userspace, often adding code just to make sure old programs that did weird things don't break.

Apple have decided to go a different route, and leave a trail of programs just a few years old that are forever unrunnable, as they won't even distribute old copies of their OSes. However, it seems many users are willing to take that choice, as we can see from their success.



> they won't even distribute old copies of their OSes

They do, actually; if you bought a copy it should be available in the App Store. They even sell physical installers for old operating systems: https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MC573Z/A/mac-os-x-106-sno...


That was the policy for several years, but this year they changed it - the Sierra installer is no longer in the App Store after you upgrade.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: