Oh thanks, I fixed the text.

I do not think Angband is a low quality game, although after reading the text this is what I understood as well, the sentence was poorly written, sorry. I intended to address the situation that some people perceive it is a "low game" and that even the worst game for Atari 2600 is better just because it does not have graphics (I play it without tiles).

I think angband is a low quality game. But that's just a religious stance, since I prefer nethack. :o) (Without tiles, of course.)