For your big bang theory you have to believe in at least 20 free choose able constants that are perfectly balanced. What about an argument for an exchange ?
What’s the name for the fallacy whereby some casually informed third party is challenged by a rando to explain a complicated concept in detail, whereupon failing to do so the rando’s whacko theory becomes truth?
I said that you need at least 20 something parameters to believe in the Big Bang Theory. You can't prove theories, you can only falsify. With every "prove" you just exclude all theories out of the infinite that exist, that do not predict a certain fact.
Date of introduction and parameters you can find here:
A German professor I used to take lessons from forwarded me some code sent by some random person he'd never met before.
The email he received said "unification and proof of dark matter and quantum theories through c++ simulation" in German.
To my surprise, the code compiled in clang without warnings, but it basically did nothing. Some functions did some additions and found ratios, results of which were simply ignored.
I felt kinda sad reading the code. Maybe he imagined he was at the verge of a discovery. But these guys are most probably schizophrenic in nature, going back and forth in reality never grasping that achievement they think they are so close to.
