> The promise was that we could create native components without any dependencies at all
This isn't true at all, and it's a big misperception about web components.
Web components are pretty low level APIs that expose a few abilities that the browser natively has: defining a tag name, hooking into element lifecycles, creating an encapsulate DOM subtree.
Web commonness have no opinion on rendering, state management, etc. and leave other aspects, like responding to property changes, to existing features like JavaScript accessors.
It's expected that developers will use libraries to help implement web components, but the libraries won't have to implement a component model, or DOM composition, or CSS scoping. So they'll be smaller and more focused, and the overall product will be faster have fewer proprietary parts.
This isn't true at all, and it's a big misperception about web components.
Web components are pretty low level APIs that expose a few abilities that the browser natively has: defining a tag name, hooking into element lifecycles, creating an encapsulate DOM subtree.
Web commonness have no opinion on rendering, state management, etc. and leave other aspects, like responding to property changes, to existing features like JavaScript accessors.
It's expected that developers will use libraries to help implement web components, but the libraries won't have to implement a component model, or DOM composition, or CSS scoping. So they'll be smaller and more focused, and the overall product will be faster have fewer proprietary parts.