Sources for what exactly? I never said that. What I said is that we have a very well credentialed and highly experienced expert saying A, and then we have random internet guy contradicting him with nothing to support his claims. You think taking what you say at face value would be the reasonable thing to do?

Why wouldn't you take the word of the well credentialed expert that did the actual investigation and pronounced it suicide?

Expert in their field versus random forum commenter is obviously a he said she said.