> Instead of the university administration focusing on priority areas, such as where parking would block exits, it becomes a profit source and they lose sight of what parking is for -- access by staff and students.
This is a strong point, and has lots of modern parallels (e.g. "civil forfeiture", gatsos), especially to do with cars. The only thing I'd say is that it's a bit of a stretch to ask the tech to prevent the university from going down this path, whether you blame it on greed or perverse incentives or whatever. I think ideally the parking enforcement system would be fair, simple, and without auxiliary functions like data collection for other purposes. What the administration (mis-)uses it for at that point is on them.
This parallels the encryption debate somewhat. Govt says 'we need a backdoor to your messaging system/phone to catch $criminal, trust our $system not to abuse it'.
Systems like Signal do not try to solve the problem of govt abuse. Instead, it constrains govts by making them find other ways to conduct surveillance, expanding the task of mass surveillance to one of creating implants for O(n) phones.
It's true that you can't prevent any University from seeking out dark tech patterns, but at least have them make that choice. The community can then have them accept responsibility for that.
Obviously legislation is needed to constrain rempant privacy violation, and we seem a long way off that, especially in the States and the UK. In the mean time, engineers should examine the ethical basis of their work, and consider how it effects their standing in society.
This is a strong point, and has lots of modern parallels (e.g. "civil forfeiture", gatsos), especially to do with cars. The only thing I'd say is that it's a bit of a stretch to ask the tech to prevent the university from going down this path, whether you blame it on greed or perverse incentives or whatever. I think ideally the parking enforcement system would be fair, simple, and without auxiliary functions like data collection for other purposes. What the administration (mis-)uses it for at that point is on them.