>But everyone I speak to in business management seems to take the view that this strengthens their view of Ubiquiti.
Ubiquiti basically needs to weigh whether it makes sense to get burned by Streisand effect now or cut their losses and hope journalists don't burn them again in the future when they don't do due diligence on a lead. After reading through the complaint, it looks like their demands are reasonable.
What I'm more interested to know is whether never issuing a correction/retraction is going to work for or against Krebs.
How would due diligence on a lead help here? Beyond establishing that 'Adam' was a company insider, I don't see how any due diligence could have picked up this set of facts.
Ubiquiti basically needs to weigh whether it makes sense to get burned by Streisand effect now or cut their losses and hope journalists don't burn them again in the future when they don't do due diligence on a lead. After reading through the complaint, it looks like their demands are reasonable.
What I'm more interested to know is whether never issuing a correction/retraction is going to work for or against Krebs.