Like others here, I read this article and largely disagree with nearly all of the points made, and for the same reasons.
However, most of this is a result of the author assuming that everyone and every organization echos their experiences and point-of-view (which isn't uncommon in online writings).
If the article were titled something along the lines of "My views on the long-term viability of CI" and the article written accordingly, then readers would be more willing to ponder alternatives to, or even a redefinition of CI in the viewpoint of the author knowing that it's a personal opinion piece.
However, most of this is a result of the author assuming that everyone and every organization echos their experiences and point-of-view (which isn't uncommon in online writings).
If the article were titled something along the lines of "My views on the long-term viability of CI" and the article written accordingly, then readers would be more willing to ponder alternatives to, or even a redefinition of CI in the viewpoint of the author knowing that it's a personal opinion piece.