> But hey, put 'Raspberry' or 'Arduino' label on it and suddenly it's so new and innovative it makes me sick.
I get why you feel that way. I think that's the nature of the huge internet and younger folk learning every day. I totally get pissy every time I see someone repost a "discovery" that is 20~30 years old and I've seen many times, just to farm clicks, karma, or whatever internet points their platform rewards. But I think that's just life now: everything is "look at me!" tiktok-ified, even engineering.
But the dude really is pushing the limits of the PICO here, always nice to see someone doing something other than blinking LEDs and jizzing about it on reddit, right?
For one thing, the PRUs require TI’s bloated mess called CCS and knowing C whereas the PIO assembly can be written in Python. What’s really innovative is the ability to get PRU-like functionality on a literal $1 IC. Sure, you only get 32 instructions per state machine, but not everyone needs full blown ARM cores for real-time.
They don't require it. When I used it, everything was just written in assembly (you get a few more instructions but you're still basically doing bitbanging with cycle counting, so using C is a bit awkward anyway). The PIOs are a pretty neat trimmed down version of the idea though, clearly someone put a fair amount of effort into making them as flexible as they are for how minimalist they are.
I think C is a trap, honestly. I have used the PRUs before and wrote my code in C. 99% of the time, I was just reading the assembly outputs trying to figure out how many instructions some C statement actually compiles to. Should have just written raw assembly for the timing-sensitive parts.
Bit of a difference between a cheap microcontroller board and a BeagleBone Black.
Superficially the PRU and the PIO do indeed look similar. Look more closely and you'll see the PRU is both more complex and more capable than the PIO. It's a small CPU core in its own right with predictable timing. PIO is significantly simpler, almost more of a programmable state machine than a proper CPU. So yes less capable but also integrated into a cheap micro-controller rather than a Linux booting SoC with all the complexity and cost that brings.
That really is why the PIO is interesting, it's the significant capabilities they bring combined with the low price point and simple chip.
Or, more like TI locked you in to their garbage IDE that cost quite a lot of money to unlock fairly standard debugging and compilation features. They entirely shot themselves in the foot with that one.
But hey, put 'Raspberry' or 'Arduino' label on it and suddenly it's so new and innovative it makes me sick.