Thank you for your reply and for your understanding of what I say.
I would say there are 2 independent separate things: the circumstance or what you are using the word true to refer to. True is a property of what is but is separate word and meaning from what is
What is can be ugly. But true the word is not. True is eternal and immune to badness
True is what Is truly, that isn't false.
The what referant or circumstances are independent of the true.
The true is not the same as the what. The what can potentially be outside the true. The what can be ugly.
From the word "true" it doesn't refer to what is not true except by duality (opposite)
The quality of true is beautiful and always good because it is what is and not what is false.
It's not the property of true that is ugly, what is going on is independent of the true.
Some thing bad going on is independent from the property of the property that some thing is going on. True refers to the absence of falseness.
In other words, the externality of what is going on is going on is beautiful, separate and independent of the not good.
Your scenario is unpleasant and not good but the scenario is independent from the idea you can be sure of the truth. Knowing you can be sure of the truth is beautiful even if the referant of the truth is ugly.
True cannot be made wet by what it refers to.
Said another way, why do people think ugly overrides the beauty of true rather than the other way round, true overrides the beauty of the ugly. It's a precedence thing.
I would say there are 2 independent separate things: the circumstance or what you are using the word true to refer to. True is a property of what is but is separate word and meaning from what is
What is can be ugly. But true the word is not. True is eternal and immune to badness
True is what Is truly, that isn't false. The what referant or circumstances are independent of the true.
The true is not the same as the what. The what can potentially be outside the true. The what can be ugly.
From the word "true" it doesn't refer to what is not true except by duality (opposite)
The quality of true is beautiful and always good because it is what is and not what is false.
It's not the property of true that is ugly, what is going on is independent of the true.
Some thing bad going on is independent from the property of the property that some thing is going on. True refers to the absence of falseness.
In other words, the externality of what is going on is going on is beautiful, separate and independent of the not good.
Your scenario is unpleasant and not good but the scenario is independent from the idea you can be sure of the truth. Knowing you can be sure of the truth is beautiful even if the referant of the truth is ugly.
True cannot be made wet by what it refers to.
Said another way, why do people think ugly overrides the beauty of true rather than the other way round, true overrides the beauty of the ugly. It's a precedence thing.