You didn't type the links he approvingly cited in by hand, and pull them up in archive.org, to see what they said, did you? That makes sense --- it's a pain --- but why would you hang your argument on the premise that nobody else took the time to do it? The links lay it pretty bare.

Somebody should take the time to further archive them, since this author keeps popping up, and, inconvenient though this truth is, it remains the apparent truth that he sent emails saying he believed this stuff.