Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For what it's worth, I'm responding to this:

    There was a recent flurry of buffer overflows in SHA3
    implementations. I'm aware of at least PHP being affected.
     
    Wanting Ed448 for political reasons, or purely for psychological
    comfort reasons, is a perfectly understandable stance to take as a
    non-expert.
     
    Unfortunately, the details that experts are privy to matter a ton, and
    severely outweigh any notions of having eggs in multiple
    baskets. We're open to having our risk calculus checked, but we're
    nearly unanimous on this one.
Who's "we" here? I think Filippo has a mainstream take on the 448 curves, but I don't know that your take on SHA3 is widely shared.


We here is people who don't advise using Ed448. It's tautology.

You don't have to agree with the specific reason I cited. That isn't encapsulated by "we". I was providing an additional argument in case the mainstream take isn't sufficient.

You cut the "To add to what Filippo said" part out of the excerpt you quoted, which was the necessary context to understand I was making an additional, supplementary argument.


I don't agree with the specific reason you cited, which is what I wrote about.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: