Security is a process, not a deliverable in the digital world.
You cannot ask domestic users to deal with a firewall. It's beyond them, this is quite unreasonable actually. Most people don't even know what is a firewall.
We are talking about a digital freedom space which has to be protected by digital police or we'll end up with digital arnachy and in the filthy hands of the digital mafia which is big tech (seems to be already the case though). The other way around is digital dictatorship, which is no better.
And as I said, it is much better to go p2p and federated than to be jailed in big tech centralized services.
But I don't see big tech to let that happen, they'll probably hire some hackers in order to sabotage it. firewalls would actually serve them well: anything beyond centralized services would be "blocked". As I said, convenient, very convenient... way too much actually.
In my country tens of millions of people have IPv6, not to mention that gateway UPNP for IPv4 is almost everywhere too, then ten of millions of people have been "following my example" for years. Of course, without an efficient digital police, this will turn to an omega sh*t show.
People who work for centralized services which could be threaten by p2p protocols are more likely to try to scare away people from them.
You cannot ask domestic users to deal with a firewall. It's beyond them, this is quite unreasonable actually. Most people don't even know what is a firewall.
We are talking about a digital freedom space which has to be protected by digital police or we'll end up with digital arnachy and in the filthy hands of the digital mafia which is big tech (seems to be already the case though). The other way around is digital dictatorship, which is no better.
And as I said, it is much better to go p2p and federated than to be jailed in big tech centralized services.
But I don't see big tech to let that happen, they'll probably hire some hackers in order to sabotage it. firewalls would actually serve them well: anything beyond centralized services would be "blocked". As I said, convenient, very convenient... way too much actually.
In my country tens of millions of people have IPv6, not to mention that gateway UPNP for IPv4 is almost everywhere too, then ten of millions of people have been "following my example" for years. Of course, without an efficient digital police, this will turn to an omega sh*t show.
People who work for centralized services which could be threaten by p2p protocols are more likely to try to scare away people from them.