Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

3 violations is enough to establish a trend, while giving people a little bit of leeway for the first and second violations since they may not know / understand the rules. 3 strike rules are formulated because there is a general consensus that such rules are fair and just, not because people like baseball.


Interesting to see that take.

As a outsider, three-strike laws have always seemed to be a uniquely American form of injustice, leading to overpunishnent. It's disappointing (and a little chilling, considering the global policies of the tech giants originate in the US) to think some people might consider them fair or just.


Two 'second' chances seems generous to me. How many would you give before acknowledging a pattern of willful violation?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: