my first reaction is that the author is a student of religion, and expands and retells modern religious evolution. You could say that the writing gives "voice" to religious thought. This topic of study and publication alone is in large contrast to many non-religious or even religious-hostile comments here on YNews

second note is that "voice" is not an accidental word.. it is literally human sound, in religious context, to others who understand it that way.. Generally, to read words, almost always means repeating the sounds in your mind with meaning at the same time.

In my view, religion is significant, is not "fake", does provide meaningful ways to see the world and is relevant to human coping and human discovery. The sounds of voice giving names to change, threats, adversity, some-definition of Evil, etc.. do matter in my view and also the view of Haberman. So I chose to amplify that writing, called a voice, with a comment here, to draw attention to the work, its inquiry, its contents and the value system that is related to those..