Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> people who tend to set unusually high standards for themselves

I would agree, at least I am like that when using Rust (though I don't contribute).

And it's true that this is a shortcut to burnout.

> or that its six-week release cycle attracts people who think that a year is a long time

I don't speak for the Rust project but to me this always sounded like a measure to avoid stagnation. Having six week slices helps remind people that this is not only a labor of love; many people out there are counting on you to get your stuff right.

Obviously Rust isn't governed like a commercial project (and thank the gods for that) and obviously many things still take years to complete but for me at least the six weeks release cycle would serve as a periodical poking a la "Hey, is your stuff progressing even a little?".

Don't know though, could be just my interpretation.



From the outside, the Rust project seems to be governed like a government project. Is that markedly better?

Linux shows us at least one way to run a successful long term project. What is their governance model?


Wish I had an answer.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: