Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The secret security services supposedly have a lot of oversight at all levels; including politicians, which in theory are accountable to the public.

(http://www.gchq.gov.uk/AboutUs/Pages/index.aspx)

I agree that's suboptimal.

I am much less worried about letting GCHQ trawl my traffic data than I am letting my local council noodle around in it. Mostly because GCHQ probably already do it - they certainly have the capability, but also because local councils have shown themselves to be corrupt and "data-leaky".

I'm not bothered about my traffic data being trawled. I oppose this bill because it's stupid - the people who have to keep data are not clearly defined; hiding some of that data is trivial for criminals; keeping that data is an unreasonable burden on some (but not all?) ISPs; etc etc.

It's frustrating that there are some really clueful politicians and advisors, yet governments keep pumping out really stupid laws about computers and networking.



Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: