Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah - they've always used an open-core licensing model with like a few features (used only by business users/applications) behind a proprietary license. They just ended up mixing the code in a way such that the (theoretically open-source) app ended up having some utility functions for the business version mixed in. Since the client apps don't use that functionality, they split the repository so that you can build the app without using any proprietary code.


Fair. I didn't know Bitwarden was open-core. In light of this, accidental packaging mixup sounds plausible.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: