Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
ddorian43
12 months ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Selective async commits in PostgreSQL – balancing ...
Probably higher cost to send 2 notifications to the user compared to always fsync on all writes in a SSD.
shayonj
12 months ago
|
next
[–]
+1 - I have found its better to instead use it on paths that you know are idempotent and recoverable. Liking expiring data on a cron and so on.
cryptonector
12 months ago
|
prev
[–]
The network is faster then the storage.
rubiquity
12 months ago
|
parent
|
next
[–]
No it isn't and hasn't been for quite some time and it will probably remain that way for the rest of our lives.
cryptonector
12 months ago
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
It still doesn't matter. All you need is enough CPU cycles to send the additional completion notice.
sgarland
12 months ago
|
parent
|
prev
[–]
With nearly all DBaaS, and _especially_ Aurora, as TFA mentions, the storage is also on the network, so it's moot.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: