So if gmail's spam filter isn't perfect, it's better to have no spam filter? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		xtdx on Sept 10, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Should Bogus Copyright Takedown Senders Be Punishe... So if gmail's spam filter isn't perfect, it's better to have no spam filter?

bpatrianakos on Sept 13, 2012 [–]

No, exactly the opposite. I'm saying if you can't have perfect then take the next best thing. In your example the next best thing would be taking an imperfect spam filter over none at all.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact