Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Arafat and Rabin received it for "their efforts to create peace in the Middle East."

Kissinger and Lê Đức Thọ received it because they "jointly worked for a ceasefire and for bringing peace to Vietnam," though Lê Đức Thọ refused it and Kissinger did not attend the ceremony.

Obama received it nine months into his Presidency for "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," despite having few if any concrete foreign policy achievements.

Obama could have at least matched Kissinger by ducking the ceremony, or even by refusing it like Lê Đức Thọ did because it wasn't justified.



Amazing that we're actually debating which of the warlords created the most peace per fatality inflicted in a discussion on the merits of their Nobel Peace Prizes.

That alone, in a sane world, would tell you these people had no business having a Nobel Peace Prize. At least Kissinger and Lê Đức Thọ had the common decency not to stand at that podium. Most of those other Nobel Peace Prize winners did not have that kind of self awareness.


Thank you, you’re making my point far better than I am. The entire discussion is out of whack.


I’m not saying I agree with his getting it but the amount of attention it has gotten and continues to get 17 years later is absolutely ridiculous




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: