This is such a sharp and underdiscussed point. I’ve been noticing the exact same pattern across tech companies:AI isn’t just replacing real work—it’s massively amplifying fake work: empty docs, generic Slack posts, performative processes, and over-engineering for promotion rather than impact. What makes this even more dangerous is that companies reward optics and proxies (LOC, meeting count, visibility) instead of real output. In those environments, AI doesn’t boost productivity; it just lets people produce more meaningless content faster. The line you drew between companies that reward real metrics vs. performative work feels spot-on. AI will benefit the former and cripple the latter. And you’re right: the overall impact on the workforce will depend entirely on how much of the economy was fake work to begin with. Great write-up — this should be talked about way more.