Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The missing piece for me is post-hoc review.

A PR tells me what changed, but not how an AI coding session got there: which prompts changed direction, which files churned repeatedly, where context started bloating, what tools were used, and where the human intervened.

I ended up building a local replay/inspection tool for Claude Code / Cursor sessions mostly because I wanted something more reviewable than screenshots or raw logs.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: