> By my reading of the five claims here, in order to be sued for this patent, you would need at least three sections of hair in your combover process (back and 2+ sides), you would need to comb over the back part before the sides, and you would need to put your hand down on each combed section as you applied hair spray.

Do you really think that these arbitrary specifics make it any more novel of an idea? The claims are the source of controversy even in software patents, because they are usually just as silly as the title makes them out to me.