but! I think if we wanted to contribute good feedback he could say what confused him/her to understand and what!

His comment doesn't clarify if he couldn't understand what the software is about or after realizing what it is about (if "read it all" could mean he understood what it is) and assuming that this is not in his interest (if he is a competitor or just not useful for him), thus deciding to use a dismissive comment, which is more probable to be of that nature because otherwise he wouldn't use two question marks ?? that indicate an attitude of not positive motive, which rather I would expect to see downmotted.

Maybe the site fails to give a first impression what it's about, or it confuses you were to look at it when the frontpage launches but I think for someone who spent reading it all like he sais, the problem not understanding could be maybe due to solution correlation to a market because maybe lack of knowledge or just maybe the market targgeted is wrong/doesn't exist or limited at first...or will have a problem of word of mouth because maybe other artists wouldn't be so ecstatic to share it but thats another problem...

I have nothing to do with music or bands but i was able to understand by just looking at the animation... We are all witnessing a change in the music industry since Napster moving from the classic delivery of music, and any software that gives momentum artist/fan direct contact maybe has potential to be part of this music industry change. After all thats maybe why iJigg stands a change to proof a winner...

now I wonder.. What if I gave a copy of Solaris to a mobile phone user? or better yet a copy of PeopleSoft's software..