The fact that there is lateralization to cortical function is not just some curio.
A stroke on the nondominant side in the same distribution leads to contra lateral hemineglect of the world. Watch these people try to draw a clock: they'll put all 12 numbers on the right side. It is interesting, to me, that the pathways are such that there is this partitioning of deficits.
It's not "left logic right creativity", but neither is it one homogenous mix.
Anyway, I think it's relevant and not simply pedantic. If you disagree, well, I suppose we can disagree politely.
I think it's odd that from my comment, which was solely dedicated to correcting your misinterpretation of his comment rather than expressing my own endorsement of it, you have extrapolated that we "disagree".
Based on your misguided comments, it is clear that we disagree on two points: (1) that I misinterpreted the OP's comment and (2) that the lateralization of the brain is or is not relevant.
A stroke on the nondominant side in the same distribution leads to contra lateral hemineglect of the world. Watch these people try to draw a clock: they'll put all 12 numbers on the right side. It is interesting, to me, that the pathways are such that there is this partitioning of deficits.
It's not "left logic right creativity", but neither is it one homogenous mix.
Anyway, I think it's relevant and not simply pedantic. If you disagree, well, I suppose we can disagree politely.