Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Attacking them just makes them more defensive, and it slows up their journey towards us."

Although this is true for mindless, nationalistic attacks, we need to attack, or any other country, where the ad-hoc censorship and manipulation of news is larger than a threshold (note that I'm not saying where they exist, since they exist in some form in all countries). Viewed in this sense your assertion is clearly wrong. As a single counterexample, consider the case of Tombstone (and related books about the Great Chinese Famine). In the NYTBR review (http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/nov/22/china-w...) it says

"But just as China is undergoing a spiritual revival today, its people are also beginning to revive history. Xinyang is now home to two tiny memorials to the famine.6 More striking, earlier this year a national newspaper ran a multipage supplement on the famine—an unprecedented recognition of this disaster.7 When I asked an editor at a leading Party newspaper why this was, he had a one-word answer: “Tombstone.” "

Conclusion: Well-intentioned and -placed and continuous push can bring about change of attitude. Even in China.



Great, so let's talk about the NSA for a moment for the sake of "well-intentioned" attack.

So what do you think about it? How shall we (if we can at all) change anything?




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: