Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I know that, but that doesn't prove anything.

- If Dorian was the real Satoshi, he would of course have used his 'real' account to try to disprove the claim.

- If not, the only to way to know for sure that he is not the guy is for the other 'real' Satoshi to prove that it couldn't be Dorian.

Simple as that. I agree that in the second case, the real Satoshi would not have a lot of incentive to prove the mistake. I'm not a conspiracy nut, I'm just saying that it has not been proven that Dorian is not the guy.



How exactly could Satoshi prove that he isn't Dorian Nakamoto?


How exactly could Satoshi prove that he isn't Dorian Nakamoto without disclosing his real identity?


By proving he is somebody else?

Not saying he would, just saying it would work.


Fair enough. :) I should have asked how he could prove it without revealing his actual identity.


Proving negatives is easy. /s




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: