Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>you could generally trust that they referred to what they said (.ly was well and truly owned by the government of Libya,

I guess I'm confused, isn't .ly a pretty good example of top level domains losing all meaning? bit.ly has nothing to do with Libya, for instance.



Well, what's interesting about the ccTLDs is that their "meaning" was purely organizational, but very clear-cut - you could trust that .us was under the ultimate authority of the US government, and that .ly was under Libyan control, no matter how ridiculous their policy for granting those domains was.

But yeah, I think bit.ly and friends really messed up a lot of the logic people expected from the DNS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: