Iinteresting how they are branding it as a backup solution, while Tesla is brand... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		BorisMelnik on May 1, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Tesla Energy Iinteresting how they are branding it as a backup solution, while Tesla is branding it as a complete replacement. "What if we could move the electricity grid off of fossil fuels" (Tesla) vs "Be prepared the next time the power goes out."(Solar City)

curiouscats on May 1, 2015 [–]

"Models

10 kWh $3,500 For backup applications

7 kWh $3,000 For daily cycle applications"

From http://www.teslamotors.com/powerwall

Maybe Solar City has been using the ones meant for daily cycle - that would make sense.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact